The Supreme Court of India is currently engaged in a significant legal battle regarding the contentious issue of the Uniform Civil Code (UCC). The court is hearing arguments from various stakeholders, including the Centre, various state governments, and several individuals and organizations. The court is expected to deliver its verdict in the coming months.

The Supreme Court of India is set to examine a case titled “Sarla Gupta and Anr. v. Directorate of Enforcement,” Crl.A. No. 104/2023.

The Supreme Court issued notice on a plea filed by Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal’s close aide Bibhav Kumar against Delhi High Court’s denial of bail in the Swati Maliwal assault case. The order was passed by a bench of Justices Surya Kant, Dipankar Datta and Ujjal Bhuyan, upon hearing Senior Advocate Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, who appeared and argued for Bibhav. The matter has been listed for next Wednesday (whenever the bench would sit in same combination). Can ED Restrain Person’s Movements During Search? Supreme Court Leaves Question Of Law Open, Allows ED To Withdraw Petition Case Details: DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND ANR. Versus DILBAG SINGH @ DILBAG SANDHU., SLP(Crl) No. 4044/2024

The ED had filed a petition in the Supreme Court seeking to overturn the High Court’s order. The High Court had ruled that the ED’s arrest warrant was invalid and that the arrest of Dilbag Singh was illegal. The ED had argued that the High Court’s order was wrong and that the arrest warrant was valid.

The Supreme Court of India has heard a case, VANSHIKA YADAV versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS., concerning the National Testing Agency (NTA) conducting the NEET-UG entrance examination. The case involves allegations of the NTA’s conduct in relation to the exam’s timing and the eligibility criteria. The Court has ruled that the NTA should avoid flip-flops and should be transparent and accountable in its actions.

The case of Shaikh Masud Ismail Shaikh and Ors. v. UOI, SLP(C) No. 10777/2019, pertains to the issue of the right to privacy in the context of the Right to Information (RTI) Act.

A. Judicial Restraint: The Cornerstone of Justice
B.

This statement reflects a cautious approach to judicial intervention in criminal cases, emphasizing the importance of utilizing established legal processes before resorting to extraordinary measures. The Court’s reasoning is based on the principle of judicial restraint, which prioritizes the preservation of the integrity and impartiality of the judicial system. The principle of judicial restraint emphasizes the importance of adhering to established legal procedures and avoiding unnecessary intervention in cases.

West Bengal VC Appointments| Supreme Court Clarifies That Regular And Not Pro Tem VCs Be Appointed In All State Universities Case Title: State of West Bengal v. Dr. Sanat Kumar Ghosh & Ors. | Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 17403 of 2023 The Supreme Court, through its order dated July 29, in an ongoing dispute between the West Bengal government and Governor CV Anand Bose (Chancellor of Universities) regarding the appointment of Vice-Chancellors (VC) of Universities, has clarified that there shall be an appointment of regular VCs (instead of pro tem VCs) in all the 36 State-aided Universities. Supreme Court Frames Issues In Tamil Nadu’s Suit Against Kerala Over Alleged Encroachment In Mullaperiyar Catchment Area

The State of Tamil Nadu v. M. Karunanidhi is a landmark case in Indian legal history. It dealt with the issue of the power of the state government to prosecute individuals for offenses committed during the period of emergency declared by the President of India. The case centered around the alleged misuse of power by the state government, specifically the Tamil Nadu government, during the Emergency.

S. 106 Evidence Act | Accused Can’t Be Asked To Discharge Burden Of Proof When Prima Facie Case Wasn’t Established By Prosecution: Supreme Court Case Details: MANHARAN RAJWADE Versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 818/2019 Recently, the Supreme Court acquitted an accused who was charged with the offence of murdering his wife because the prosecution was not able to prove the prima facie case against the accused. For invoking Section 106 of the Indian Evidence Act of 1872 (“Evidence Act”), the prosecution ought to have discharged the burden on it by adducing cogent evidence to prove the accused presence at the relevant time in his house when the alleged offence was committed, the bench comprising Justices Abhay S Oka, PK Mishra, and AG Masih said.

VS. DIVYA SPANDANA, INC. This is a case of defamation brought by Divya Spandana, Inc. against Asianet News Network Pvt. Ltd., alleging that the latter published defamatory statements about her.

The National Housing Bank (NHB) filed a suit against Bherudan Dugar Housing Finance Ltd. (BDHFL) for alleged breach of contract and misrepresentation. NHB claimed that BDHFL had failed to deliver on its promise to provide housing loans to eligible borrowers.

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of THE STATE OF GUJARAT Vs. M/S. AMBUJA CEMENT LTD, Civil Appeal No.

* **Supreme Court Restricts Second Appeals in India**
* **No Second Chances:

The Supreme Court of India held that a second supplementary appeal (SLP) cannot be filed if the first SLP was dismissed without providing reasons or was withdrawn. This ruling stemmed from a decision in the case of N.M.A. v. Union of India, 2019.

Transferring Public Property At Nominal Price Arbitrary; States’ Right Can Be Sold Only By Auction/Transparent Process : Supreme Court Case Details: City Montessori School Versus State of U.P. & Ors., CIVIL APPEAL NO. 8355 OF 2024 The Supreme Court observed that the rights of the State in the property/land can be transferred only by adopting a fair and transparent process by which the State fetches the best possible price. Supreme Court Rejects Plea Seeking Clearance By Coastal Zone Management Authority For Railway Double-Tracking In Goa Case Details: GANV BHAVANCHO EKVOTT & ORS v. SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY & ORS., Diary No(s).18197/2023

The Supreme Court has ruled that the Lieutenant Governor of Delhi can nominate members to the Delhi Municipal Corporation (DMC) without the consent of the Delhi government. This decision was made in the case of “Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Office of Lieutenant Governor of Delhi, WP(C) No.

Supreme Court Issues Notice On West Bengal Govt Plea Against HC Judgement Quashing OBC Classification Of 77 Communities Case Details : THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ANR. Versus AMAL CHANDRA DAS Diary No. – 27287/2024 The Supreme Court today (on August 05), issued notice in a petition filed by the State of West Bengal against the Calcutta High Court’s judgment which quashed the classification of 77 communities as Other Backward Classes (OBC) given under the West Bengal Backward Classes (Other than Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes) (Reservation of Vacancies in Services and Posts) Act, 2012 and cancelling all Other Backward Classes (OBC) certificates issued in West Bengal after 2010.

A.K. Enterprises, a small-scale manufacturing unit, approached the Supreme Court seeking relief against the classification of its loan account as an Non-Performing Asset (NPA). The company claimed that the bank had wrongly classified its loan account as an NPA without following the procedure outlined in the Reserve Bank of India’s (RBI) 2015 notification.

Plea In Supreme Court Seeks Probe Into Alleged EVM Manipulations, Violations By ECI During Lok Sabha Elections 2024 Case Details: MEHMOOD PRACHA v. ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA A petition has been filed in the Supreme Court seeking the constitution of a High-Powered Committee chaired by a retired judge of the Supreme Court to inquire into the allegations of manipulations of the Electronic Voting Machines (EVM) during the recent Lok Sabha elections. The petitioner also sought a probe into alleged derelictions by the Election Commission of India. Intended To Get Rid Of ‘Hand’: Supreme Court Dismisses PIL To Ban Use Of ‘Body Parts’ As Election Symbols

Case Details : SARGUJA SOCIETY FOR FAST JUSTICE Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR Diary No. – 31637/2024 The Supreme Court on Monday (August 5) dismissed a petition seeking directions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to prohibit the use of any ‘body part’ as an election symbol by political parties. Fake Encounter Case | Supreme Court Refuses To Suspend Conviction Of Ex-Mumbai Cop Pradeep Sharma For Contesting Assembly Elections Case Details: Pradeep Rameshwar Sharma vs State of Maharashtra., Diary No. 13604-2024 The Supreme Court today (on July 05) refused to suspend the conviction of former Mumbai Police encounter specialist Pradeep Sharma in a fake encounter killing case.

The appeal challenges the High Court’s decision to convict Sharma on the basis of circumstantial evidence. The appeal also challenges the High Court’s decision to impose a life sentence. The appeal further challenges the High Court’s decision to deny Sharma’s request for a lesser sentence.

The case of S. Srinivasan v. Union Of India And Ors. is a landmark case in Indian law concerning the right to privacy. The case was filed by S.

** The Supreme Court of India has expressed serious concerns about the issue of plastic pollution in river banks and water bodies, specifically highlighting the impact of plastic waste on the environment. The Court acknowledged the widespread nature of this problem and emphasized the need for stringent measures to address it. The case, ASHOK KUMAR SINHA v.

Supreme Court Admits West Bengal’s Plea Challenging HC Direction For CBI Probe Into 2021 Post-Poll Violence Cases Case Details: THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL vs. UNION OF INDIA., Diary No. – 20668/2021 Today (August 06), the Supreme Court admitted the State of West Bengal’s appeal against the Calcutta High Court’s order directing Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to probe into the incidents of alleged violence following the 2021 state assembly polls. The Bench of Justices M.M Sundresh and Aravind Kumar granted leave to appeal in the Special Leave Petition filed by the State and sought CBI’s response to this plea. The matter will be next listed on November 20.

** The Supreme Court has recently affirmed that a Bachelor of Science degree in Polymer Chemistry (B.Sc. Polymer Chemistry) is not equivalent to a Bachelor of Technology (B.Tech) in Chemical Engineering. **Details:**

* **Background:** This case involved a dispute between a candidate and the Institute of Technology (IT). The candidate, pursuing a B.Sc.

This practice direction aims to streamline the process of filling Special Leave Petitions and to ensure that the Court’s resources are utilized efficiently. The practice direction outlines specific guidelines for the filing of Special Leave Petitions, including the format, content, and supporting documents. It also specifies the time limits for filing and the procedures for filing.

The Supreme Court has held that those redesignated from Research Assistant to Lecturer and subsequently as Assistant Professor cannot be considered as regular appointments to extend the benefits of the ‘Career Advancement Scheme’ (CAS). Supreme Court Provisionally Allows Candidates From Andhra Not Enrolled In Telangana Bar Council To Appear For Telangana Civil Judges Exam Case Details : VINDELA GEETHA BHARGAVI & ORS. v. THE STATE OF TELANGANA & ANR. Writ Petition (Civil) No.489/2024 The Supreme Court on August 6 temporarily allowed candidates from Andhra Pradesh, who had not enrolled in the Telangana Bar Council, to appear for the mains of the Telangana Civil Judges Exam.

The petitioners, who had cleared the preliminary exam, were unable to submit documents for the main exam because they lacked enrollment certificates from the Telangana Bar Association. Delimitation Commission’s Orders Aren’t Immune From Judicial Review : Supreme Court Case Details: KISHORCHANDRA CHHANGANLAL RATHOD Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS., CIVIL APPEAL No.7930 OF 2024 The Supreme Court held that nothing precludes the constitutional courts from checking the validity of orders passed by the Delimitation Commission on the touchstone of the Constitution if an order is found to be manifestly arbitrary and irreconcilable to constitutional values. ‘We Are Pained’ : Supreme Court Expunges P&H High Court’s Unwarranted Observations Against SC’s Stay Order

Case : In Re : Order of Punjab and Haryana High Court Order Dated 17.07.2024 and Ancillary Issues | SMW(c) 8/24 Taking suo motu notice of an unusual order passed by the Punjab and Haryana High Court, a 5-judge bench of the Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 7) expunged the “unwarranted” remarks in the High Court’s order criticizing a stay order passed by the Top Court. Supreme Court Holds Police Inspector & Magistrate Guilty Of Contempt For Arrest & Remand Of Accused Violating SC Order CASE TITLE: TUSHARBHAI RAJNIKANTBHAI SHAH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT, SLP(Crl) No. 14489/2023, TUSHARBHAI RAJNIKANTBHAI SHAH vs. KAMAL DAYANI Diary No.- 1106 – 2024

The apex court’s decision comes after a long and arduous legal battle that spanned over two years. The accused, a businessman named Amit Kumar, had been arrested by the police inspector on charges of cheating and fraud. However, Amit Kumar had already obtained an interim anticipatory bail order from the Supreme Court.

The Supreme Court of India in the case of M/S D.K. Jain & Co. v.

While setting aside a blacklisting order passed by Kolkata Municipal Corporation against a commercial entity, the Supreme Court recently observed that blacklisting orders are a “drastic remedy” and as such, they ought to be justifiable as well as proportionate. Arbitration | Impermissible For Arbitral Tribunal Or Courts To Grant Interest Upon Interest Under 1940 Act : Supreme Court Case Details: M/S D. KHOSLA AND COMPANY VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA, SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) NO.812 OF 2014 The Supreme Court held that an Arbitral Tribunal is not empowered to grant interest upon interest while passing an arbitral award as the Arbitration Act, 1940 does not specifically provide for the grant of interest on interest.

S. 138 NI Act | ‘Capacity To Give Loan Not Shown, Contradictions In Statements’ : Supreme Court Upholds Acquittal In Cheque Dishonour Case Case Details: SRI DATTATRAYA VERSUS SHARANAPPA, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3257 OF 2024 The Supreme Court upheld the acquittal in a cheque dishonour case by taking note of certain contradictions in the statements of the complainant, as well as his inability to show the financial capacity to advance the loan as well as the lack of acknowledgement of the loan in the Income Tax returns. Mere Attempt To Overtake Vehicle On Road Doesn’t Mean Rash & Negligent Driving : Supreme Court

The Court has clarified that the act of overtaking must be done in a manner that is safe and reasonable, and that the driver must be aware of the traffic conditions and the presence of other vehicles. The Supreme Court has also emphasized the importance of the driver’s duty to exercise caution and to avoid causing harm to others. This duty is not limited to the driver’s immediate surroundings but extends to the entire road and the traffic flow.

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Allarakha Habib Memon Etc. v. State of Maharashtra, ruled that a confession recorded by a medical officer when the accused were presented by police officers was inadmissible as evidence. The court held that such a confession was obtained through coercion and lacked voluntariness. The ruling is significant because it sets a precedent for protecting the right to silence and ensuring fair trials in India.

The Supreme Court of India has recently heard a case concerning the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and its powers to investigate and prosecute individuals suspected of money laundering. The case, Manish Sisodia v. Directorate of Enforcement, SLP(Crl) No.

The Supreme Court’s decision comes after the Allahabad High Court had ordered the inspection of the disputed site in the city of Ayodhya, Uttar Pradesh, India. The Allahabad High Court’s order was based on a petition filed by the Hindu parties, who claimed that the mosque was built on a site that was historically significant to Hindus. The petition argued that the mosque was built on the site of the birthplace of Lord Krishna, a revered figure in Hinduism.

‘Can’t Put Career Of 2 Lakh Students At Risk” : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea To Postpone NEET-PG 2024 Exam Case Title: Vishal Soren @ Bishal Soren & Ors. v. National Board of Examination in Medical Sciences & Anr. |Diary No. 35578-2024 The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking postponement of the NEET-PG 2024 examination, which is scheduled for August 11, 2024. The petitioner also challenged the decision of the National Board of Exams to hold the exam in two batches and apply a normalisation formula. Supreme Court Disposes Newsclick’s Plea, Stays Tax Recovery Until Disposal Of ITAT Appeal Case Details: PPK NEWSCLICK STUDIO PVT. LTD. VS. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., DIARY NO. – 24553/2024

The Supreme Court’s order came after the ITAT had issued a notice to NewsClick, directing it to deposit a sum of ₹1.5 crore within 15 days. The ITAT notice was issued following a tax audit conducted by the Income Tax Department. The audit revealed discrepancies in the company’s financial records, leading to the demand for ₹1.5 crore.

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Condition That Only Malayali Brahmins Can Be Sabarimala Temple Chief Priest Case : Sujith TL v. State of Kerala and others | Diary No(s).25008/2024 The Supreme Court on Friday (August 9) issued notice on a petition challenging the Kerala High Court’s judgment which upheld the condition that only Malayali Brahmins can be appointed as the Melshanthis (Chief Priests) of the Sabarimala-Malikappuram temples. Decision To Reduce Pay Scale Can’t Be Applied Retrospectively: Supreme Court Quashes Recovery Steps Against Retired Govt Servant Case details: Jagdish Prasad Singh v. State of Bihar & Ors, Civil Appeal No. 1635 of 2013

The Supreme Court observed that any step of reduction in the pay scale and recovery from a Government employee would tantamount to a punitive action because the same has drastic “civil as well as evil consequences.” RTE Act : Supreme Court Affirms Bombay HC Judgment Quashing 25% Quota Exemption For Private Schools If Govt-Run Schools Existed Nearby Case Details : ASSOCIATION OF INDIAN SCHOOLS Versus STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS. SLP(C) No. 17770/2024 The Supreme Court refused to interfere with the Bombay High Court’s judgment which struck down the Maharashtra amendment to the Right to Education Act 2009 exempting private schools from providing the 25% quota in Class I or Pre-school for children of disadvantaged sections, if there is a government-run or aided school within 1 km radius of that private school.

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Challenge To Recognition Of ‘Central Delhi Court Bar Association’ As Bar Body Of Rouse Avenue Case details: Rouse Avenue District Court Bar Association v. Bar Council of Delhi & Ors, Diary No. 31378-2024. The Supreme Court on Friday issued notice on a petition challenging the decision of the Delhi High Court approving the recognition of Central Delhi Court Bar Association as the official bar association of the Rouse Avenue District Court. How To Determine Conversion Of Arbitral Award In Foreign Currency To Indian Currency? Supreme Court Explains Case Details: DLF LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS DLF UNIVERSAL LTD) AND ANR. VERSUS KONCAR GENERATORS AND MOTORS LTD., CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7702 OF 2019

* The Supreme Court has ruled that an arbitral award in foreign currency can be enforced in India, even if the award is expressed in foreign currency. * The court has clarified that the Indian courts can enforce foreign arbitral awards in Indian currency.

‘Post-Investigation’ FIR Suspicious: Supreme Court Holds Probe Tainted As Police Concealed Actual First Information Case Details: ALLARAKHA HABIB MEMON ETC. VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO(S). 2828-2829 OF 2023 The Supreme Court reversed the conviction in a murder case after noting serious loopholes regarding the registration of the First Information Report. The Court found that the FIR was registered not on the basis of the actual first information, but on the basis of a subsequent complaint. The Court said that such a “post-investigation” FIR does not inspire confidence. BREAKING| Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Challenging Decision To Hold UGC-NET Re-test On Aug 21

The case of Parveen Dabas and Ors. vs. Ministry of Education and Ors. W.P.(C) No.

The Supreme Court today extended for 6 weeks the stay on defamation proceedings initiated against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for retweeting a video by Youtuber Dhruv Rathee making certain allegations against Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) IT Cell. Supreme Court Seeks CBI/ED Response On BRS Leader K Kavitha’s Plea For Bail In Liquor Policy Case Case Title: KALVAKUNTLA KAVITHA Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, SLP(Crl) No. 10778/2024 (and connected matter) The Supreme Court issued notice to the CBI and the ED on Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha’s pleas for bail in the money laundering and corruption cases related to the alleged Delhi liquor policy scam.

A bench of Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan passed the order upon hearing Senior Advocate Mukul Rohatgi (for Kavitha) who argued that she has been in jail since 5 months and the chargesheet/prosecution complaint in both the ED and CBI cases have been filed. Supreme Court Dismisses Himachal Pradesh Govt’s Appeal Against HC Decision Quashing Illegal Land Acquisition Case details: State of Himachal Pradesh & Ors v. Balbir Singh & Anr, Diary No. 33473-2024 The Supreme Court on Monday dismissed an appeal filed by the State government of Himachal Pradesh challenging the division bench’s order of the Himachal High Court which had stated that the government forcibly acquired private property violating the fundamental right under Article 300A of the Indian Constitution.

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea To Remove Time Limits On Shop Licenses For Disabled Persons Case details: Daya Swaroop v. Delhi Transport Infrastructure Diary No. 18089-2022 The Supreme Court dismissed a petition seeking that licenses allotted to disabled persons to run shops etc., should not be limited by a time-period. A bench of Justices PS Narasimha and Pankaj Mithal was hearing a petition where the petitioner challenged an Office Memorandum dated August 1, 2016 by which certain policies were laid down for the allotment and renewal of the license of shops, spaces, and sites for commercial utilisation at the Inter-State Bus Terminals of Delhi.

Supreme Court Stays Delhi HC Direction That Old Pension Scheme Is Applicable To Paramilitary Forces/CAPF Personnel Case Title: UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Versus LOKESH KUMAR ARYA, SLP(C) No. 21758/2023 (and connected matters) The Supreme Court today confirmed the interim stay on a direction that the Old Pension Scheme (OPS), in accordance with CCS (Pension) Rules, 1972, shall be applicable to paramilitary forces/Central Armed Police Forces personnel as well. Supreme Court Dismisses ED’s Plea Against HC Order Allowing NDTV To Seek Compounding Of Alleged FEMA Violations Case Title – Directorate of Enforcement v. New Delhi Television Limited The Supreme Court on Monday (August 12) dismissed the plea by Directorate of Enforcement (ED) challenging a Bombay High Court order that allowed New Delhi Television (NDTV) to pursue compounding proceedings for alleged violations of the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) before the Reserve Bank of India (RBI).

The Supreme Court in the case of State of Rajasthan & Ors. v. Smt. Rajeshwari Devi & Ors.

The Supreme Court directed the Union Health Ministry to convene an online meeting with all the State Secretaries of the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare to chalk-out a road map for implementation of the National Commission for Allied and Healthcare Professions (NCAHP) Act, 2021 within 2 weeks. Supreme Court Issues Notice To ED On Vijay Nair’s Bail Plea In Liquor Policy Case Case Details: VIJAY NAIR vs. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT., Diary No. – 22137/2024 Today (on August 12), the Supreme Court issued notice to the Directorate of Enforcement (ED) on the bail plea of Aam Aadmi Party communications-in-charge Vijay Nair in a money laundering case pertaining to the national capital’s excise policy.

Can Muslim Police Personnel Claim Right To Keep Beard As Religious Practice? Supreme Court To Consider Case Details : ZAHIRODDIN SHAMSODDIN BEDADE vs. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA MOHE MINISTRY THROUGH ITS SECRETARY C.A. No. 000435 / 2015 The Supreme Court has listed for hearing an appeal which raises the issue whether the suspension of a Muslim police personnel for keeping a beard is violative of the fundamental right to practice religion under Article 25 The bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud comprising of Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra agreed to examine the said issue raised by a Muslim constable of State Reserve Police Force, Maharashtra (SRPF) who was suspended for keeping a beard against the Bombay Police Manual of 1951.

Supreme Court Dismisses Plea Of Environmental Lawyer Against Notice For Income Tax Reassessment Case Details : RITWICK DUTTA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, SLP(C) No. 016904 – / 2024 The Supreme Court on Monday (August 12) dismissed a petition filed by environmental lawyer Ritwick Datta challenging a notice issued by the Income Tax Department for reassessing the returns for 2019-20 AY. Supreme Court Stays Defamation Proceedings Against Editorial Director Of Bennet Coleman Over Times Of India Article Case Details : JAIDEEP BOSE Versus M/S BID AND HAMMER AUCTIONEERS PRIVATE LIMITED SLP(Crl) No. 10212/2024 The Supreme Court today (August 12) stayed criminal defamation proceedings against Jaideep Bose, Editorial Director of Bennett Coleman and Co Ltd, which publishes the newspaper Times of India.

This is a significant development in the ongoing legal battle over the controversial Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA). The bench has stayed the proceedings in the case challenging the CAA, which was filed by a group of individuals and NGOs. The stay order comes as a major relief to the government, which had been facing pressure from various quarters to withdraw the controversial law.

The Supreme Court has reserved its verdict on the bail plea of Tamil Nadu Minister Senthil Balaji in a money laundering case. The court has flagged the delay in the trial as a major concern. The court has expressed its displeasure over the slow pace of the investigation and the lack of progress in the case. The court has also noted that the delay in the trial is impacting the minister’s right to a fair trial.

Case Title – Jalaluddin Khan v. Union of India The Supreme Court held that ‘bail is the rule, jail is the exception’ even in special statutes like the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967. If the conditions in the special statute for the grant of bail are met, then bail should be granted, the Court stated. Misleading Ads : Supreme Court Closes Contempt Case Against Patanjali, Baba Ramdev & Acharya Balkrishna Accepting Apology, Gives Stern Warning Case Title: In Re: Patanjali Ayurved Limited, through its Managing Director, Acharya Balkrishna, Baba Ramdev, SMC(C) No.4/2024 The Supreme Court today closed the contempt proceedings pending against Patanjali Ltd, its Managing Director Acharya Balkrishna and co-founder Baba Ramdev over the publication of misleading medical advertisements in breach of a court undertaking. While the notices issued to the contemnors were discharged, the Court warned that they should comply with all future orders of the court and not repeat their past conduct.

Jostling & Pushing To Wriggle Out Of Arrest Didn’t Amount to Criminal Use Of Force : Supreme Court Sets Aside Conviction U/S 353 IPC Case details: Mahendra Kumar Sonker v The State of Madhya Pradesh, Criminal Appeal No. 520 of 2022 The Supreme Court today (August 12) set aside the conviction and sentence of the appellant under Section 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860. The present appeal challenges the order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court dated October 14, 2009, which confirmed the conviction of the appellant under Section 353 and sentence of six months simple imprisonment and a fine of Rs. 1000 imposed by Special Judge.

The Indian Penal Code (IPC) does not explicitly mention the initiation of perjury proceedings against a litigant. However, the Supreme Court of India has laid down certain guidelines and principles that govern such proceedings. These guidelines are based on the principles of natural justice and fairness. **Detailed Text:**

The Indian Penal Code (IPC) is a comprehensive legal framework that outlines various offenses and punishments within the Indian legal system.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 14) rejected the argument that its judgment delivered on July 25 upholding the powers of the States to tax mineral rights and mineral-bearing lands should be given only a prospective effect from the date of the judgment. ‘We Aren’t Granting Interim Bail’ : Supreme Court Issues Notice On Arvind Kejriwal’s Bail Plea In CBI Case Case Title: Arvind Kejriwal v. Central Bureau of Investigation, SLP(Crl) No. 11023/2024 (and connected case) The Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 14) issued notice on the petition filed by Delhi Chief Minister and Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) chief Arvind Kejriwal seeking bail in the case registered by the Central Bureau of Investigation in connection with the alleged Delhi Liquor Policy scam.

Supreme Court Stays Action Against YouTuber Savukku Shankar In 16 TN Police FIRs Case Details : A. Shankar @Savukku Shankar v. State of Tamil Nadu &Ors. W.P.(Crl.) No. 000340 / 2024 The Supreme Court today (August 14) stayed coercive proceedings against Youtuber Savukku Shankar in 16 FIRs filed against him over an interview given by him on a YouTube Channel. Shankar, an independent journalists and YouTuber was arrested on May 4, 2024, for allegedly making defamatory remarks against female police personnel during an interview with the YouTube channel RedPix 24×7 on April 30, 2024. Following this incident, a total of 16 FIRs were filed against Shankar in different districts of Tamil Nadu, all stemming from the same interview.

Railway Accident| Claimants Entitled To Benefit Of Higher Compensation Prescribed After Date Of Incident: Supreme Court Case Details: Doli Rani Saha Versus Union of India, Civil Appeal No 8605 of 2024 The Supreme Court reiterated that in railway accident compensation claimants, if the compensation claimed is less than the compensation prescribed as on the date of the decision, then they are entitled to the higher amount. Supreme Court Stays NCLAT Order Closing Insolvency Process Against Byju’s, Asks BCCI To Deposit Rs.158 Crores In Separate Escrow Account Case Details : GLAS TRUST COMPANY LLC Vs BYJU RAVEENDRAN | Diary No. – 35406/2024

1,300 crore. The Supreme Court’s decision comes after the NCLAT had passed an order on August 10, 2023, directing the insolvency proceedings against BYJU’s to be closed. The NCLAT had found that the BCCI had failed to prove its claim of Rs. 1,300 crore in dues.

** The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a plea seeking the postponement of the NEET-SS 2024 examination. The court directed the National Medical Commission (NMC) to announce the exam schedule within 30 days. The case was filed by Rahul Balwan, a student seeking to postpone the exam.

D. (Pediatrics) from AIIMS, New Delhi, filed a plea challenging the INI CET 2024 seat allotment results. He argued that the AIIMS quota for postgraduate medical students should be implemented in the INI CET 2024. The plea was filed in the Supreme Court of India.

Supreme Court Says Telangana Governor’s MLC Nominations Will Be Subject To Outcome Of BRS Leaders’ Petition Case details: Dr. Dasoju Sravan Kumar v. The Secretary to Her Excellency, The Hon’ble Government, State of Telangana, Diary No. 34897-2024 The Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 14) issued notice on a petition filed by Bharat Rashtra Samithi (BRS) leaders Dasoju Sravan Kumar and Kurra Satyanarayana seeking to prevent the Telangana Governor from nominating members of the State Legislative Council. While the Court declined to pass an order of status quo on the nomination of Member of Legislative Council (MLC), it clarified that the nominations will be subject to the outcome of the petition.

No Assertion In ED Complaint That Scheduled Offences Generated Proceeds Of Crime : Supreme Court Grants Bail In PMLA Case Case Title – Bhagwan Bhagat v. Directorate of Enforcement and Anr. The Supreme Court recently granted bail in a case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) after noting that the prosecution complaint did not have any assertion that the scheduled offence generated proceeds of crime directly or indirectly. West Bengal Post-Poll Violence : Supreme Court Sets Aside HC Order Transferring Trial Of One Case, Says No Proper Service Of Notice To Accused Case details: Saher Ali Mia & Ors v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors, SLP(Crl) No. 1506/2024 (Disposed Of)

The Supreme Court on August 9 set aside an order of the Calcutta High Court, transferring the trial commenced at Coochbehar to Special CBI Court at Siliguri in the case lodged in the aftermath of the 2021 West Bengal Legislative Assembly elections for serious offences including murder and rape. Supreme Court Issues Contempt Notice To Punjab & Haryana High Court Bar Association For Abstaining From Court Work Case Title – M/S M3M India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors. The Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 14) issued a notice to the Secretary of the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association, asking for an explanation as to why contempt action should not be initiated for lawyers abstaining from work in July 2024.

Supreme Court Issues Notice To ED In Abbas Ansari’s Bail Plea In Money Laundering Case Case details: Abbas Ansari v. Directorate of Enforcement, Allahabad, SLP(Crl) No. 10598/2024 The Supreme Court today (August 14) issued notice in the special leave petition filed by Abbas Ansari, MLA from Mau from Suheldev Bharatiya Samaj Party, against the order of the Allahabad High Court denying bail to him in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 case. Foreign Judgment Violative Of Indian Law Not Binding On Indian Courts : Supreme Court Case Details: Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No(s).1722/2024 The Supreme Court in a recent order has held that a foreign judgment that goes against Indian law is not conclusive between parties involved and not binding on the Indian Courts.

The bench of Justices Surya Kant and Ujjal Bhuyan was hearing a challenge against the order of the Gujarat High Court which dismissed the petitioner’s writ of Habeas Corpus seeking repatriation of the minor daughter on the basis of an order from the US Court. Motor Accident Claims | Supreme Court To Examine If Appeal Pre-Deposit Conditions Can Be Higher Than Limit Prescribed Under MV Act Case Details : PRADEEP KUMAR v. MASTER ANKIT & ANR. SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION (CIVIL) Diary No(s). 30751/2024 The Supreme Court is set to consider the legal issue whether the Courts could demand a deposit amount beyond the statutory limit for entertaining appeals against claims awarded under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The Supreme Court of India has recently affirmed the permission granted to a company, PIC Departmentals Pvt. Ltd., to file a written statement after a delay of 17 years in a case against the Union of India. This decision, based on the HC Registry’s confusion regarding the company’s registration, highlights the importance of clarity and accuracy in legal proceedings.

man alleges he was kidnapped and assaulted by a Madhya Pradesh minister. The man, identified as Asim Khan, claims he was targeted for his caste and political affiliation. The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognizance of the alleged abduction and assault of OBC man Asim Khan by Madhya Pradesh Minister, alleging caste-based discrimination and political vendetta.

The case of SRI SUJIES BENEFIT FUNDS LIMITED vs. M. JAGANATHUAN, Criminal Appeal No. 2019 (2020) revolves around a dispute concerning the recovery of a loan. The appellant, M.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday (August 14) granted bail to a juvenile who had been in custody for over a year, noting that the Juvenile Justice Board (JJB), trial court, and the Rajasthan High Court failed to record a specific finding that the proviso to section 12(1) Juvenile Justice Act is applicable to the case. Supreme Court Reiterates Prima Facie View That Second SLP Cannot Be Filed If First SLP Was Dismissed Without Any Reasons Or Was Withdrawn Case Title: NF Railway Vending and Catering Contractors Association Lumding Division v. Union of India & Ors. The Supreme Court bench of Justice Dipankar Datta and Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra reiterated its prima facie view that in cases where a special leave petition (SLP) was dismissed by way of a non-speaking order or withdrawal, the remedy of filing a fresh SLP does not exist.

**Supreme Court Upholds Section 149 BNS and Constitution Articles in Dr.

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Dr. SN Kundra v. Union of India, has dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) challenging the applicability of Section 149 BNS and certain Articles of the Constitution. The court ruled that these provisions are not unconstitutional and dismissed the PIL with a cost.

The Supreme Court on August 14 stayed three paragraphs of the impugned order of the Allahabad High Court, wherein the court directed the Uttar Pradesh police to seek legal opinion from Government counsel prior to registering a First Information Report (FIR) in cases which prima facie appeared to be civil transactions. Supreme Court Takes Suo Motu Case Over RG Kar Hospital Doctor’s Rape & Murder; Hearing On Aug 20 Case Title : In Re : Alleged Rape and Murder of Trainee Doctor in RG Kar Medical College Hospital, Kolkata and related issues | SMC(Crl) 2/2024 The Supreme Court has taken suo motu cognisance of the rape and murder of a doctor in RG Kar Hospital in Kolkata.

A bench comprising Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud, Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra will hear the matter on Tuesday(August 20). The case is titled “In Re : Alleged Rape and Murder of Trainee Doctor in RG Kar Medical College Hospital, Kolkata and related issues.” ‘Entire Incident Occured In Heat Of Moment’ : Supreme Court Approves Alteration Of Conviction To Section 304-II IPC Case Title: HUSSAINBHAI ASGARALI LOKHANDWALA VERSUS STATE OF GUJARAT, CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1691 OF 2023 The Supreme Court in a recent case allowed the release of a convict in a 24-year-old case of culpable homicide by altering the punishment imposed on him to the period already suffered in incarceration.

The Indian Supreme Court has upheld the conviction of a man who killed his wife in a fit of anger. The court found that the man was a young man at the time of the incident and had acted without premeditation. The court also noted that the man’s age and the lack of premeditation were mitigating factors in his case.

This task force, composed of experts from various fields, will be tasked with identifying and addressing the root causes of the safety concerns. The Supreme Court’s decision to establish this task force is a significant step towards addressing the systemic issues that have plagued the medical profession for years. It signifies a commitment to ensuring the safety and well-being of medical professionals, a crucial aspect of the healthcare system.

Lok Sabha Elections 2024 : Supreme Court Dismisses Plea For Probe Into Alleged EVM Manipulations, Violations By ECI Case Title: MEHMOOD PRACHA Versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF INDIA, W.P.(C) No. 473/2024 The Supreme Court today dismissed a plea seeking inquiry into the allegations of Electronic Voting Machine (EVM) manipulations and violations by the Election Commission of India during Lok Sabha Elections 2024. A bench of Justices Sanjiv Khanna and Sanjay Kumar passed the order, observing that omnibus and vague assertions had been made by the petitioner and that he has already approached the Delhi High Court with regard to a particular constituency.

Supreme Court Permits Teesta Setalvad To Travel To Malaysia For Anti-Racism Conference Case Details: TEESTA ATUL SETALVAD vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT v. Diary No. – 35856/2024 The Supreme Court today (on August 20) has permitted human rights activist Teesta Setalvad to travel to Selangor, Malaysia from August 31 to September 10. The purpose of this travel is to attend a conference pertaining to anti-racism. Natural Guardian’s Right To Custody Of Child Not Lost Just Because Temporary Custody Was Given To A Relative: Supreme Court Case Title: GAUTAM KUMAR DAS VERSUS NCT OF DELHI AND OTHERS, SLP(Crl) No. 005171 – / 2024

While granting custody of a minor daughter to her father, the Supreme Court observed that granting temporary custody of a minor child to a relative would not preclude the natural guardian from seeking custody of a minor child. View Of Coordinate Bench Of Same HC Can’t Be Ignored: Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Over Non-Supply Of WhatsApp Chats Case Details: Shabna Abdulla v. The Union of India & Ors, Criminal Appeal No. 3282 of 2024 The Supreme Court today (August 20) quashed a detention order upheld by a division bench of the Kerala High Court, noting that once the coordinate bench of the High Court had set aside the detention based on same grounds and material relied, the division bench could not have ignored the same.

Reserved Category Candidate Can Claim General Category Seat Of Horizontal Reservation Based On Merit : Supreme Court Case Title: RAMNARESH @ RINKU KUSHWAH AND OTHERS VERSUS STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS, SLP(C) No. 2111 of 2024 The Supreme Court on Tuesday (Aug. 20) set aside the Madhya Pradesh High Court’s order which refused to allow admission of the meritorious reserved category candidates to the unreserved (UR) category. ‘Not A Case Of Passive Euthanasia’ : Supreme Court Expresses Reluctance To Entertain Euthanasia Plea Of Man In Vegetative State Case Details : HARISH RANA Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. SLP(C) No. 18225/2024

The court, in its judgment, emphasized the sanctity of life and the need for a robust legal framework to govern such sensitive issues. The man, identified as Mr. X, had sought the court’s intervention to end his life due to a debilitating illness.

No Justification For Not Using CAMPA Funds : Supreme Court Seeks Details From States/UTs On Amounts Spent For Afforestation Case Title: IN RE : T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS., W.P.(C) No. 202/1995 The Supreme Court (on August 07) directed the State Governments/Union Territories to file an affidavit, inter-alia, to chart out the reasons why the CAMPA(Compensatory Afforestation Fund Management and Planning Authority) Funds, created to use it for compensatory afforestation and allied activities, have not been utilised. Why Ask Lawyers To File Physical Copies In Addition To E-Filed Copies? Supreme Court Asks NCDRC Case Details : USHA GARG VS. UNION OF INDIA W.P.(C) No. 000313 – / 2024

The Supreme Court on Tuesday (August 20) verbally observed that asking advocates to file physical copies of their appeals/applications at the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in addition to virtual filing would defeat the purposes of e-filing. Supreme Court Issues Notice To Manipur Chief Secretary In Contempt Petition Over 2016 MPSC Recruitment Exams Case Title: LAISHRAM TARAJEET SINGH & ANR. VERSUS VINEET JOSHI & ORS., CONMT.PET.(C) No. 611-620/2024 The Supreme Court recently issued contempt notice to the Chief Secretary of Manipur-Vineet Joshi in a case filed by serving officers of the State, alleging willful disobedience of the Court’s order.

A bench of Justices CT Ravikumar and Sanjay Karol issued the notice, dispensing with the personal presence of the alleged contemnors (Joshi and Land Resources Department Secretary-Namoijam Kheda Vrata Singh) for the time being. Supreme Court Dismisses Karnataka Congress MLA NA Haris’ Plea Against HC Entertaining Petition Challenging His Election Case Title: N.A HARIS Versus K. SHIVAKUMAR AND ORS., SLP(C) No. 8299/2024 The Supreme Court today refused to interfere with Karnataka High Court’s decision to continue hearing an election petition filed by BJP’s K Shivakumar challenging the election of Congress MLA NA Haris from Shantinagar assembly constituency in the Karnataka Legislative Assembly Elections (2023).

The Supreme Court has granted bail to Fr. Abraham Thazhathedathu, a Catholic priest, and the authorities of a school in Kerala, who were arrested by the police for allegedly charging illegal fees and selling books without permission. The court’s decision came after the Kerala High Court had earlier dismissed the bail pleas of the accused. The case revolves around the alleged irregularities in fee collection and book sales at St.

This decision, delivered by a five-member bench headed by Justice D.Y. Chandrachud, is a significant development in the reservation policy for persons with disabilities. It clarifies the legal framework for determining cut-off marks for these categories, providing much-needed clarity and certainty for stakeholders. The court’s ruling, however, has sparked debate among legal experts and activists.

2023-04-19. The Supreme Court of India is set to hear a case that will likely have significant implications for the accused in criminal cases. The case, Mohammed Jabir v. National Investigation Agency, Diary No. 2023-04-19, involves a plea for default bail and an application to extend time for filing the chargesheet.

**

The case of Kousik Das & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors. revolves around the issue of land acquisition for a proposed industrial park. The petitioners, Kousik Das and others, challenged the legality of the acquisition of their land for the project.

RG Kar Hospital Case | No Adverse Action Against Doctors For Past Protests If They Return To Duties : Supreme Court While hearing the suo motu case on the RG Kar Hospital murder-rape crime, the Supreme Court on Thursday (August 22) reiterated it appeal to the protesting doctors to return to their duties. The Court passed an order protecting the doctors from coercive actions for protesting till today if they resume duties. Byju’s Insolvency| Supreme Court Declines Byju’s & BCCI Plea To Stay Meeting Of Committee Of Creditors Case Details : GLAS TRUST COMPANY LLC Vs BYJU RAVEENDRAN | Diary No. – 35406/2024

The Supreme Court’s decision comes after the Committee of Creditors had sought an interim stay on the meeting. The Committee of Creditors had argued that the meeting would violate their rights and interests. The Supreme Court’s decision is significant because it allows the Committee of Creditors to proceed with the meeting, which is crucial for the insolvency resolution process.

The Supreme Court’s decision comes after a long and complex legal battle between the Maharashtra government and the Bombay High Court Bar Association. The Bar Association had argued that the land allotted for the new building was not suitable for the construction of a high court building. They claimed that the land was prone to flooding and lacked proper drainage.

Supreme Court Seeks TN Govt Response On Plea Challenging Savukku Shankar’s Preventive Detention Case Details : A. KAMALA vs. STATE OF TAMIL NADU W.P.(Crl.) No. 000352 / 2024 The Supreme Court today (August 22) issued notice to the State of Tamil Nadu in the plea challenging the recent detention of YouTuber Savukku Shankar under the preventive detention law. The bench of CJI DY Chandrachud and Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra was hearing the habeas corpus petition filed by his mother. ‘Virtually Rendered Bail Order Ineffective ‘: Supreme Court Relieves Accused From Furnishing Local Surety Case Details: Girish Gandhi v. The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., WP (Crl) No. 149 of 2024.

This decision, while seemingly straightforward, has significant implications for the accused’s right to liberty and the administration of justice. The Supreme Court’s ruling, in its landmark decision, has been hailed as a victory for the accused, as it effectively removes the burden of providing multiple sureties for bail. This decision is particularly significant in cases where the accused is unable to provide multiple sureties due to financial constraints or other limitations.

** The Supreme Court, in its landmark decision in the case of Radheyshyam & Ors. v. State of Maharashtra, has ruled that mere non-performance of an agreement to sell does not amount to an offence of cheating or criminal breach of trust. The Court observed that while non-performance of an agreement is a breach of contract, it is not inherently criminal.

This emphasis was made in the case of *State of Chhattisgarh vs. NGT* where the Court held that the CECB, as a State organ, has a duty to ensure timely compliance with the directions of the NGT. The Supreme Court’s decision in *State of Chhattisgarh vs. NGT* is significant because it reinforces the principle of judicial review and the importance of environmental protection.

Supreme Court Grants Anticipatory Bail To Malayali YouTuber Shajan Skariah In SC/ST Act Case On Kerala MLA’s Complaint Case Title: Shajan Skaria v The State of Kerala | Crl.A. No. 002622 / 2024 The Supreme Court on Friday allowed anticipatory bail to the editor of the Malayalam YouTube News Channel ‘Marunadan Malayalee’ Shajan Skaria in a criminal case under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act 1989 over making alleged derogatory remarks against MLA PV Sreenijin. University Can’t Act Arbitrarily, Must Explain Denial Of Legitimate Expectation : Supreme Court In Law Professor’s Plea For Regularisation Case Title: MAITREYEE CHAKRABORTY VERSUS THE TRIPURA UNIVERSITY & ORS., SLP (CIVIL) NO. 16944 of 2022

While directing the Tripura University to decide the plea for regularization of an Assistant Professor (Law) engaged by it on “lien vacancy”, the Supreme Court recently observed that a statutory body such as a University cannot act unfairly and arbitrarily in matters of regularization. The decision to regularize should not be based “on the whims of the decision-making authority”; rather, it should have good reasons to justify the exercise of its power. BREAKING| Supreme Court Allows Benefit Of Section 479 BNSS To Undertrials In Cases Registered Before July 1, 2024 Case Title: Re-Inhuman Conditions In 1382 Prisons v. Director General of Prisons and Correctional Services and Ors., W.P.(C) No. 406/2013

In a significant development, the Supreme Court today (on August 23) held that Section 479 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) – the replacement of the Code of Criminal Procedure- would apply retrospectively to the undertrials across the country. It means that the provision will apply to all undertrials in cases was registered before July 1, 2024. ‘Temporary’ Employees Working For Decades Like Regular Govt Employees Can’t Be Denied Equal Benefits: Supreme Court Case Title: RAJKARAN SINGH & ORS. VERSUS UNION OF INDIA & ORS., C.A. No. 009721 / 2024 The Supreme Court on Thursday (Aug. 22) observed that the employees who were performing the duties indistinguishable from the regular government employees cannot be deprived of the benefits accorded to the government employees.

Supreme Court Asks Police Chiefs To Take Action Against Erring Officials For Arrests In Violation Of S.41/41A CrPC & SC Guidelines Case Details: Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr, Miscellaneous Application No. 2034/2022 in MA 1849/2021 in SLP(Crl) No. 5191/2021 The Supreme Court recently directed that every Magistrate and Sessions judge to inform its jurisdictional Principal District judge about any form of non-compliance by the police in following the arrest guidelines laid down in the Satender Kumar Antil’s case within 1 week of recording such non-compliance. Supreme Court Orders CBI Inquiry Into Alleged Illegalities In Chandigarh Police’s Arrest Of Dentist

The Supreme Court of India has recently ruled that the police can use force to arrest a person if they have reasonable grounds to believe that the person is committing a crime. This ruling, which was made in the case of Union Territory of Chandigarh v. Mohit Dhawan, has been met with mixed reactions.

Is Sanction Under PC Act Necessary For Court To Direct Investigation Under S.156(3) CrPC? Supreme Court To Consider Case Title: BS Yediyurappa v Abraham TJ And Ors. SLP(Crl) No. 8675/2022 The Supreme Court on Friday (August 23) pondered whether a prior sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 (PCA) would be required for a Magistrate to direct an investigation into cognisable offences by a public servant relating to PCA under S.156(3) of CrPC. High Time Police Officers Are Given Training On Distinction Between ‘Cheating’ & ‘Criminal Breach Of Trust’ : Supreme Court Case Title: Delhi Race Club (1940) Ltd. & Ors. Versus State of Uttar Pradesh & Anr., CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 3114 OF 2024

The Supreme Court’s observation came during the hearing of a case related to the alleged cheating and criminal breach of trust by a former employee of a private company. The court observed that the two offenses are often confused, and police officers often fail to differentiate between them. This confusion can lead to wrongful arrests and convictions.

The Supreme Court of India has quashed the corruption charges against M/S. KarnatakaEMTA Coal mines Limited and another in the case of M/S. KarnatakaEMTA Coal mines Limited And Another v. State of Karnataka, 2023 SCC OnLine Kar 1077.

The Supreme Court of India, in the landmark case of Damodar & Anr. Versus The State of Uttar Pradesh, Criminal Appeal No. 1077 of 1999, affirmed the conviction of a husband for dowry death.

HC Can’t Quash Cheque Dishonour Complaint Invoking S.482 CrPC When Complainant Hasn’t Consented For Compounding: Supreme Court Case Details: A.S. Pharma Pvt. Ltd. V. Nayati Medical Pvt. Ltd. & Ors., Criminal Appeal No(s). 3051 – 3052 of 2024 The Supreme Court (on July 23) reiterated that dishonour of cheque cases can be compounded under Section 147 (Offence to be compoundable) of the Negotiable Instruments Act (N.I. Act) only with the consent of a complainant. Judge Not Post Office Of Prosecution, Must Apply Judicial Mind To Determine If Case For Trial Is Made : Supreme Court Case Details: M/S. Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Limited And Another v. Central Bureau of Investigation, Criminal Appeal No. 1659-1660 of 2024

While quashing two orders passed by the Special Judge, CBI in a corruption case against the appellant Karnataka EMTA Coal Mines Ltd, the Supreme Court on August 23 held that the CBI judge failed to apply his mind to determine whether a case for trial was made out by the prosecution at the discharge stage under Section 227 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC). Consumer Protection Act – Dominant Purpose To Be Looked Into To Ascertain Whether Transaction Was Commercial: Supreme Court Case Title: Omkar Realtors and Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Kushalraj Land Developers Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., Civil Appeal No.858 of 2023

While dealing with the issue whether a real estate company that purchased a flat for the personal use of its Director is a “consumer” under Section 2(7) of the Consumer Protection Act, the Supreme Court recently reiterated that deciding the intended use of the purchased goods (personal or commercial) would depend on the facts and circumstances of each case. Use Of Artificial Yellow Colouring ‘Tartrazine’ In Permitted Food Items Not Offence Of Adulteration : Supreme Court Case Details : MAHESH CHANDER @ MAHESH CHAND v. STATE OF HARYANA (@SLP (CRL.) No(s). 4706/2019) The Supreme Court in its recent order has held that the use of artificial yellow food coloring- Tartrazine in food items like Dal Moong Dhuli cannot penalized as an offence under the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (PFA Act).

* **Parity in the Workplace: A Case of Qualifications vs.

The Supreme Court of India has recently ruled that employees governed by different rules and having different duties cannot claim parity simply based on the same qualification. This judgment, delivered in the Indian Council of Agricultural Research through the Director General and Anr v. Dr.

Case Title: USHABEN JOSHI VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS, SLP(C) No. 6427/2019 The Supreme Court recently granted the relief of regularization to a woman engaged as “water woman” (sweeper) with the Posts and Telegraph Department, Gujarat, who served the Department for over 30 years but was not regularized, even though another similarly placed woman employee was conferred the benefit. Duty Of Every Arbitral Tribunal & Court To Examine What The Contract Provides : Supreme Court Case no. – Pam Developments Private Limited v. State of West Bengal & Anr. The Supreme Court recently emphasised that the courts and arbitral tribunals have the duty to examine the contract clauses in proceedings concerning arbitration.

Supreme Court Issues Notice On Ex-IPS Officer Sanjiv Bhatt’s Appeal Challenging Conviction & Life Term In Custodial Death Case Case Details: SANJIV KUMAR RAJENDRABHAI BHATT vs. THE STATE OF GUJARAT., Diary No. – 14516/2024 The Supreme Court today (on August 27) issued notice to the State of Gujarat on former Indian Police Service officer Sanjiv Bhatt’s plea challenging the Gujarat High Court’s order dismissing his challenge against the conviction and life imprisonment sentence imposed by the Jamnagar Court. The conviction was in connection with an alleged case of custodial torture and death in the year 1990. Supreme Court Grants Bail To K Kavitha In Liquor Policy Case, Questions Fairness Of CBI/ED Investigation

Case Title : KALVAKUNTLA KAVITHA Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT | SLP(Crl) No. 10778/2024 & KALVAKUNTLA KAVITHA v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION |SLP(Crl) No. 10785/2024 The Supreme Court on Tuesday(August 27) granted bail to Bharat Rashtra Samithi leader K Kavitha in the money laundering and corruption cases related to the alleged Delhi liquor policy scam A bench comprising Justices BR Gavai and KV Viswanathan, during the hearing, questioned the fairness of the prosecution agency (CBI/ED) and criticised their selective approach in treating some accused as approvers. Supreme Court Stays Ayush Ministry’s Notification That Omitted Prohibition On Ads Of Ayurvedic, Unani & Siddha Drugs Without Approval

The case of Indian Medical Association v. Union of India, W.P.(C) No. 10471/2019, dealt with the issue of the government’s power to regulate medical professionals.

The Court’s decision comes after the ED’s attempt to circumvent legal process by seeking a stay order on the summonses while the matter was pending before the court. This case highlights the importance of upholding the due process of law and the need for accountability in public administration. The ED’s attempt to circumvent legal process was deemed as an attempt to undermine the judicial process and therefore, the Supreme Court upheld the summonses.

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Prem Prakash v. Union of India through the Directorate of Enforcement, has ruled that bail is the rule and jail is the exception in India. This landmark decision emphasizes the presumption of innocence and the right to liberty.

‘What Sort Of IAS Officer?’ : Supreme Court Issues Contempt Notice To Maharashtra Addl Chief Secretary (Revenue & Forest) Case Title: IN RE : T.N. GODAVARMAN THIRUMULPAD Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS., W.P.(C) No. 202/1995 The Supreme Court today (on August 28), issued a show-cause notice for contempt action to Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Additional Chief Secretary Revenue and Forest Department, Maharashtra Government, taking exception to certain statements in an affidavit filed by him which suggested that the Court was not following the law. Observing that the statements were prima facie contemptuous, the Court directed him to remain personally present on September 09.

The Supreme Court of India has ruled that a child victim of traumatic sexual assault must not be repeatedly called to testify in court. This landmark decision, delivered in the POCSO Act case of Madhab Chandra Pradhan & Ors. v. State of West Bengal & Ors., emphasizes the importance of protecting the child’s best interests and ensuring a fair trial.

A. Family Feud: Canara Bank vs.

**

The case revolves around a dispute between K. Nirmala and her family members and Canara Bank regarding a loan agreement. The family members had taken a loan from the bank for the purchase of a property. However, they defaulted on the loan payments, leading to the bank initiating legal proceedings. The family members, including K.

* **Lack of Resources:** Filling vacancies in PCBs requires significant financial resources, which may be scarce in some states.

Case Title: NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL AND ANOTHER VERSUS MANJU TOMAR AND OTHERS, CIVIL APPEAL NO(S). 7440-7441 OF 2012 (and connected matter) The Supreme Court on Wednesday (Aug. 28) held that New Delhi Municipal Corporation (“NDMC”) would not be liable for absorption and payment of benefits to the excess staff of the school run by the Delhi Sikh Gurudwara Management Committee (“DSGMC”) on account of the closure of the school done by the DSGMC without the prior approval of the NDMC. Woman Absolute Owner Of Stridhan, Father Cannot Seek Its Recovery From In-Laws Without Her Authorization: Supreme Court Case Title – Mulakala Malleshwara Rao & Anr. v. State of Telangana & Anr.

This decision has sparked debate about the Hindu Law of Inheritance and the rights of women in inheritance. **Please note:** I am unable to provide legal advice. This is for informational purposes only and should not be taken as professional legal guidance. **The Supreme Court’s Decision**

The Supreme Court recently delivered a significant ruling that has implications for the understanding and application of the Hindu Law of Inheritance.

The Supreme Court of India has recently issued a landmark judgment in the case of K. Ravi v. State of Karnataka, 2023 (2) KLR 477.

Supreme Court Directs No Coercive Steps Be Taken Against Journalist Who Interviewed Gangster Lawrence Bishnoi In Jail Case : ABP NETWORK AND ANR. Versus UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. Diary No. 36514-2024 The Supreme Court today (August 30) directed that no coercive steps be taken against the ABP News Journalist who interviewed gangster Lawrence Bishnoi in Punjab and Rajasthan Jails. The bench led by CJI DY Chandrachud comprising Justices JB Pardiwala and Manoj Misra was hearing the challenge against Punjab and Haryana High Court’s directions to the SIT headed by Prabohd Kumar IPS, to lodge an FIR in the matter pertaining to the interview so that an investigation can be conducted as per the provisions of CrPC.

**
The Supreme Court of India has refused to modify its order on the Jalgaon Mosque dispute, allowing the petitioners to file a review petition. The court maintained its earlier stance that the demolition of the mosque was not unlawful. The court’s decision has been met with criticism from various quarters, including human rights organizations and religious scholars.

* **Bihar’s Legislative Council:

This writ petition challenges the constitutionality of the Bihar Legislative Council election process. The petitioner, Sunil Kumar Singh, argues that the election process is flawed and violates fundamental rights. He claims that the election process is opaque, lacks transparency, and fails to provide adequate representation for the people.

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of U.P.

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of U.P. State Road Transport Corporation & Ors. v. Ram Gopal Singh & Ors.

The Supreme Court of India has granted special leave to appeal (S.L.A.) in the case of Anil Jindal v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office, Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No. 1177 of 2023.

The case of MHABEMO OVUNG & ORS. VERSUS M. MOANUNG BA & ORR. ORS., Civil Appeal Nos.

High Court Can Quash FIR Even After Charge-Sheet Is Filed : Supreme Court Case Title – Shaileshbhai Ranchhodbhai Patel and Anr. v. State of Gujarat and Ors. The Supreme Court recently reiterated that the high court is empowered under section 482 CrPC to quash an FIR even after charge sheet is filed if the court is satisfied that continuing the proceedings would be an abuse of the process of law. News PMLA Provides No Procedure On Summoning, So CrPC Will Apply : Sibal Tells Supreme Court In Abhishek Banerjee’s Case Case Title: ABHISHEK BANERJEE AND ANR. Versus DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT, Crl.A. No. 2221-2222/2023 (and connected case)

During the hearing of TMC MP Abhishek Banerjee’s plea against ED summons in a school jobs scam case, Senior Advocate Kapil Sibal urged before the Supreme Court on July 31 that the Prevention of Money Laundering Act provides “power” to summon an accused, but does not prescribe the “procedure” for summoning. Supreme Court Questions Registry Over Missing Files, Seeks Secretary General’s Report Case Details: BAIDYA NATH CHOUDHARY vs. DR. SREE SURENDRA KUMAR SINGH., Diary No. – 18663/2018 The Supreme Court asked its Secretary-General to submit a report on lapses pertaining to missing relevant documents in a case. Due to these lapses, the Court ended up wasting one hour while hearing a case.

The Bench of Justices JK Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal were hearing a contempt petition that had 43 connected cases. While the first paper book was available before the Court, the second one was not to be found. Delhi LG Wasn’t Told About Need For Court’s Permission To Cut Trees : Chief Secretary Tells Supreme Court Case Details: Bindu Kapurea v. Subhasish Panda Dairy No. 21171-2024, In Re Subhasish Panda Vice Chairman DDA SMC(Crl) No. 2/2024 Chief Secretary of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi, Naresh Kumar, informed the Supreme Court that Delhi Lieutenant Governor VK Saxena was not made aware of the necessity to obtain the court’s permission for felling trees in the southern Ridge.

The Supreme Court has ordered Punjab and Haryana to propose names for a committee to resolve the ongoing farmers’ protest at the Shambhu Border. The court has given them a deadline of 10 days to do so. The court’s decision comes after the Punjab and Haryana governments had requested the court to intervene in the matter.

The petitioner, Sharif D. Rangnekar, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutionality of the National Green Tribunal Act, 2010. He argued that the Act was unconstitutional because it violated the principle of judicial review. He claimed that the NGT’s jurisdiction was too broad and that it could potentially overstep its bounds.

This decision was made in response to the rising number of cases of non-performing assets (NPAs) in the financial sector. The DRTs are intended to provide a faster and more efficient way to recover debts owed to banks and financial institutions. The Supreme Court’s decision was met with mixed reactions. Some welcomed the initiative, seeing it as a much-needed reform in the financial sector.

Supreme Court Appoints Nikhil Goel As Amicus To Determine Why FSL Reports In NDPS Are Not Filed On Time Case details: Bablu Singh v. The State of Madhya Pradesh, SLP (Crl. Appeal) No. 631/2024 The Supreme Court bench of Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Rajesh Bindal has appointed Senior Advocate Nikhil Goel as the amicus curiae to consider the larger canvas of why States are not able to submit Forensic Science Laboratory (FSL) report along with Challan for the alleged recovery of the drug within the stipulated time under the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). UPSC Aspirants’ Deaths : Supreme Court Initiates Suo Motu Case On Safety Compliances Of Delhi Coaching Centres

Case Details: COACHING FEDERATION OF INDIA Versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS., Diary No. 30149-2024 The Supreme Court initiated a suo motu case to ascertain the safety compliances of coaching centres in Delhi in the wake of the recent tragedy where three aspirants died in a flooded basement at Rau’s IAS coaching centre in Delhi’s Old Rajendra Nagar. Kanwar Yatra : Supreme Court Extends Stay On UP, Uttarakhand Directives To Eateries To Display Owner & Staff Names Case Title: ASSOCIATION FOR PROTECTION OF CIVIL RIGHTS (APCR) Versus THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ORS., W.P.(C) No. 463/2024 The Supreme Court today extended the interim order of status quo over Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand governments’ directives that eateries along the Kanwariya pilgrim route must display names of the owners and staff.

The committee was formed to investigate the violence in Manipur and provide recommendations for peace and reconciliation. The committee was initially scheduled to submit its report by August 15, 2023. The extension will allow the committee to complete its investigation and submit a comprehensive report. **Key Points:**

* **Extension granted:** The Supreme Court has extended the term of the Justice Gita Mittal Committee by six months.

Can Criminality Be Inferred Merely Because Policy Benefited Wholesalers? Supreme Court Asks ED In M